Skip to main content

The Global Charter of Conscience is official launched

On 20 June, the Global Charter of Conscience a declaration reaffirming and supporting Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (about “freedom of thought, conscience and religion”) was officially launched in the European Parliament, in an event hosted by Finnish MEP Sari Essayah. The growing tensions involving religion, worldview and ideology have become a massive global problem, an international group of leading academics and activists say to Europe and the world.  This firm and principled document aims to bring religious tolerance back to the centre of public debate with guidelines to discuss and resolve present problems in a constructive, rights-honouring manner. 

 (More information about the Charter you will find here)


The document has already gained significant support, including from Dr Heiner Bielefeldt, United Nations Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, and Dr Habib Malik, a rewarded Lebanese human-rights activist, whose father Charles Malik was the chief drafter of the Universal Declaration. “This is a powerful document,” says Heiner Bielefeldt, who wrote a special recommendation for the Global Charter of Conscience. “The potential to inspire practical commitment and to contribute to a better understanding of human rights in general is enormous.”
 

The Charter was initiated by English author and social critic Dr Os Guinness. The text has been drafted under the leadership of Os Guinness and Dr Thomas Schirrmacher, a German sociologist of religion. It was reviewed over the course of three years by people of many faiths and none, including more than 50 academics, politicians of many persuasions and NGOs, all committed to a partnership on behalf of “freedom of thought, conscience and religion” for all. “We want this to become something that people can refer to,” says Guinness. The drafters of the Charter are now opening it to further endorsements, and are working with activists towards practical implementation. The clear intent is also to impact civic education, Guinness adds, “so that freedom becomes in Alexis de Tocqueville’s famous term, the ‘habits of the heart.’”

The Global Charter of Conscience underlines the challenges of pluralism in the globalized world, with its rising diversity of beliefs, worldviews and ways of life. It sees many current approaches to diversity as increasingly problematic, and even dangerous. A recent study showed that three quarters of the world’s population live in countries where is a high degree of menace to their faith. In France, Sikhs found themselves forced to remove their turban, whilst in England, employees have lost their job for being unable to act on religious conscience in the workplace. The Charter points that “the responsibilities of a civil public square all pose a particular challenge to the traditional standing of established, or monopoly religions,” which should recognize their excesses as well as the rights of others, including non-religious people. It also challenges “exclusive forms of secularism,” and advocates for “a proper recognition of the rights of religious people in public life.”

“The Charter in fact allows everyone to be free to be faithful to what they believe, and acknowledge the ‘dignity of difference’,” says Thomas Schirrmacher. “We need to provide a solution to do away with the polarisations and aggravating the bitterness surrounding religion in public life – as in the so-called culture wars.” The Global Charter of Conscience encourages a new culture of civility where robust and noisy public debate is seen as good for society. “This is the only way we can secure and uphold freedom of conscience in the twenty-first century,” says British barrister Dr David McIlroy, another endorser.
 
Subsequent launch events will follow in Bonn and London

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Christmas Greeting

Corruption Scandal on the Sale of Schengen Visas in Malta discussed in the European Parliament

Ivan Grech Mintoff (leader of the ECPM-Member Party Alleanza Bidla) presented in the Maltese court  a transcript of the testimonies of several Libyans who claimed that in 2015, they bought an unknown number of humanitarian medical visas from an official in the Office of the of the Maltese Prime Minister. These medical visas are not supposed to be sold. Following an agreement between Malta and Libya, they are issued for free. The documents submitted in the court also claim that Schengen visas were illicitly sold at the Maltese Consulate in Tripoli over a period of 14 months (in 2013 and 2014). In this period, 88000 Schengen Visas (300 visas per day including Saturdays and Sundays) have been sold. This illegal scheme could have earned the perpetrators millions of euros.  Although the Consulate in Tripoli has closed, it is unclear if this practice has stopped or is still continuing via other countries or Malta up to today. On the 27th of June, ECPM invited Mr Mintoff to the European P

Biases Attack Pro-Life and Pro-Family Organizations

  The debate on abortion was stirred up again after the recent leak of the draft proposal of the US Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. Mainly negative reactions to this news circulated in the media. The debate on abortion has become increasingly subjective where, particularly, the pro-life arguments are marginalized and negatively framed. Last February, we saw this in the European Parliament as well where the FEMM committee (Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality of the European Parliament) held a public hearing on the ‘Countering the anti-gender movement today to secure a gender equal Europe tomorrow’ , a side event of the Future of Europe Conference. As the title of the hearing suggests, this event was a one-sided story on the topic, seeking to invalidate other opinions and attacking several Christian organizations on their pro-life advocacy and promotion of Christian values. The hearing displayed the immaturity of the debate on abortion and gender issues. There is need