Skip to main content

Antisemitic EU Sponsored Palestinian Textbooks: the EU Should Take Action!

 


MEPs raise concerns on the incitements to violence, terrorism, and antisemitism in Palestinian schoolbooks in the disputed areas. A group of 32 members of Parliament addressed a letter to EC President Ursula von der Leyen in which they point at problematic content present in educational materials that are used in Palestinian schools. Their call is strengthened by an adopted text in the EP which condemns the textbooks in which incitements to violence as well as hate and antisemitism are found, as several studies reported. The reoccurrence is unacceptable and ongoing negotiations with the Palestinian Authority (PA) have not achieved much. The European Commission and President Von der Leyen are urged to include conditionality on funds to the PA, if necessary changes in textbooks are not made. Furthermore, the letter criticizes the Commission for failing to reject a controversial report by Amnesty International that characterizes Israel an apartheid state.

This article is made in collaboration with Koen Strijk

Antisemitic educational content in the Palestinian Authority has been a problem for years. Palestinian pupils learn to hate Jews and emulate terrorists. While voices of concern were expressed, the European Commission has been passive and failed to take effective action to counter the schoolbook problem. Inaction on the problem does not only lead to Palestinian children being educated to hate Israelis. It also means the continuation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict for the future generations.

Textbook Studies, Dangerous Findings

Textbooks used in the Palestinian schools have been investigated for years. Time and again, research presents a problematic picture of the schoolbooks’ content: promotion of antisemitism, rejection of peace, absence of tolerance and coexistence, encouragement of martyrdom and Jihad, violence, terror glorification and justification, dangerous libel, erasure from Israel on the maps, dehumanization and demonization of Israelis and the delegitimization of Jewish history and self-determination. An EU-commissioned report conducted by the Georg Eckert Institute (GEI) pointed out that, although there have been ameliorations, violent and hateful schoolbooks are present and fail to meet UNESCO Standards of peace, tolerance, coexistence and non-violence.

Earlier Pledges without Changes

Since the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on textbooks is not new, calls for EU attention and action have been advocated by MEPs several times. Last summer, a letter was sent to President Von der Leyen by a group of MEPs on this issue containing a similar message as the recent letter. Despite pledges to alter the content of textbooks by the Palestinian Authority, no significant changes have been made. This was also confirmed by an IMPACT-se (an Israeli non-profit organization that monitors the content of school textbooks) report that confirmed this. PA authorities reacted to the report by stating that the textbooks express a national narrative and national identity. In last summer's letter, MEPs are concerned with the inaction of the PA authorities underlining that “years of negotiations with the PA and repeated Commission pledges of “zero tolerance” for antisemitism have unfortunately failed to bring about the desired change” and remind President Von der Leyen that “asking the PA to revise these books is not an imposition but a self-evident and non-negotiable duty”. Last April, during a meeting of the Committee on Budgetary Control the issue was heatedly debated. Among others, MEP Bert-Jan Ruissen (ECR/ECPM, the Netherlands) and IAF European Parliament Chairman repeated the message of latest letter to President Von der Leyen.

Funding? Fine, but with Conditionality

Palestinian educators are paid by European Union funds. As they teach from books with the abovementioned content, the funding is incompatible with and contradictory to EU values and the common goal of working toward peace.. Consequently, the latest letter asks the EC President to include a conditionality to the educational funding to the Palestinian Authority. Without the PA adjusting the educational materials, the possibility to reduce funding must be available. The letter does not call for a complete stop of funding to the PA. On the contrary, the MEPs express they “wholeheartedly support EU funding for the PA”, though they do not want EU taxpayers’ money to be spend on incitement.

European Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Oliver Varhelyi, who earlier considered the conditionality of financial support, allegedly made a proposal to withhold 10 million euros of financial aid if reforms of the curriculum are not conducted. Moreover, several media outlets report that over 200 million euros of aid to the Palestinian Authority is frozen. Palestinian Foreign Minister Al-Maliki made clear that he does not accept the conditionality proposed by the Commissioner . However, Mr Varhelyi recently visited the disputed areas where he reiterated the EU support of the Palestinian people and the PA. The annual aid is to be continued. Since 2017, the EU’s bilateral assistance to the disputed areas  focused on governance reform; rule of law; access to water and energy services and to sustainable economic development. In 2020, the EU gave 204 million directly to the Palestinian authority.

EU Strategy on Combating Antisemitism and Fostering Jewish Life

The EU Strategy on Combating Antisemitism and Fostering Jewish Life provides clear statements applicable to the current case of the textbooks' antisemitic passages. In the Strategy, the EU declares to promote full compliance of educational material with UNESCO standards. It continues by stating that “any material that goes against them [UNESCO standards] risks undermining peace and co-existence and has no place in textbooks or classrooms”. Moreover, the Strategy also emphasizes that the EU external funds may not be misallocated to activities that incite hatred and violence, including against Jewish people. This is mentioned as one of the key actions of the European Commission and the High Representative. Clearly, by sponsoring antisemitic textbooks and failure to act, the EU does the opposite of what it portrays to do in its policy and proves itself unreliable.

A Counter Letter from the Left

Leaders of the S&D, Greens/EFA, and The Left also wrote a letter to Ursula von der Leyen in response to the alleged proposal by Commissioner Varhelyi. The left-wing politicians reject the conditionality of the financial assistance of the PA. They argue that the reduction of financial assets by which educators are paid would negatively affect the right to education of Palestinian pupils and students, and potentially be counterproductive as it opens opportunities for extremists which will have negative consequences on the prospect of peace. Furthermore, the letter calls the proposal stigmatising to the Palestinian educational system at large, and a confirmation of the prejudice that Palestinian hate of Israel is due to education and schooling instead of Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands.

They make it clear in their letter that they side with the Palestinians and do not see the textbooks as problematic. Additionally, they fail to recognize that raising the younger generation with the idea that the other is to be fought and the use of violence is justified or even a duty exacerbates conflicts and is not conducive to de-escalation. It may be appealing to side with the weakest, however, leaving the opportunity to feed the younger generation with hate will not lead to peace. 

EP Condemns Palestinian Textbooks

On May 4th, the European Parliament finallj adopted a report in which it officially condemns the antisemitism in Palestinian textbooks and study cards. The EP calls for all EU funded study materials and educational personnel to maintain the UNESCO standards of peace, tolerance, co-existence, and nonviolence. The report asks the Commission to closely scrutinize the PA and the modification of the curriculum. Moreover, the report calls the EC to “fully introduce the principle of conditionality” and to “ensure a legal framework that provides for these support instruments” hereby following the suggestion made in the letter to Von der Leyen by the 32 MEPs. The adopted report is a boost for all those who fight antisemitism in Europe.

No EU Rejection of the Amnesty Report

MEPs who support Israel, expressed also in their letter to Commission their disappointment with the European Commission who has not rejected the controversial report on Israel recently published by Amnesty International. The report calls Israel an apartheid state. The document has been controversial since its publication. Governments of the USA, UK, Canada, Germany and other EU members states have rejected the report. Tellingly, Israel’s Regional Cooperation Minister Esawi Frej, himself an Arab member of the left-wing Meretz Party, responded to the Amnesty report by stating that “Israel has many problems that must be solved … but Israel is not an apartheid state.” The writers of the letter to Von der Leyen ask for an EU that is distancing from the odious report.

Conclusion

After new studies on the antisemitic, hateful, and violent content in Palestinian schoolbooks, MEPs call on the Commission to act. For years the Commission negotiated with the Palestinian Authorities to alter the content of its textbook, however, time and again it appears no result was achieved. A conditionality should be included in the financial aid mechanism: the possibility to reduce funding on educational matters if alterations in textbooks are not made. It cannot be that future generations of Palestinians are educated to hate the other. This only worsens the conflict and makes the prospect of peace in the region impossible. The parties on the left should face the problem of the incitement, antisemitism, and hatred in Palestinian schoolbooks, and stop with looking the other side or blaming the Israel as left-wing MEPs have done in their counter letter and in the debate in the Committee on Budgetary Control. Closing the eyes and inaction will not increase the prospect of peace in the region and a stable and peaceful solution. The EU must take further action on the textbook problem and ensure antisemitism disappears from educational materials in the disputed areas

 

Click here to read the letter to EC President Ursula von der Leyen on behalf of 32 MEPs.
Click
here to read the IMPACT-se reports on antisemitic educational materials in the disputed areas.
Click
here to watch the debate in the Committee on Budgetary Control.
Click
here to read the report in which the EP condemns the Palestinian textbooks.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Christmas Greeting

Corruption Scandal on the Sale of Schengen Visas in Malta discussed in the European Parliament

Ivan Grech Mintoff (leader of the ECPM-Member Party Alleanza Bidla) presented in the Maltese court  a transcript of the testimonies of several Libyans who claimed that in 2015, they bought an unknown number of humanitarian medical visas from an official in the Office of the of the Maltese Prime Minister. These medical visas are not supposed to be sold. Following an agreement between Malta and Libya, they are issued for free. The documents submitted in the court also claim that Schengen visas were illicitly sold at the Maltese Consulate in Tripoli over a period of 14 months (in 2013 and 2014). In this period, 88000 Schengen Visas (300 visas per day including Saturdays and Sundays) have been sold. This illegal scheme could have earned the perpetrators millions of euros.  Although the Consulate in Tripoli has closed, it is unclear if this practice has stopped or is still continuing via other countries or Malta up to today. On the 27th of June, ECPM invited Mr Mintoff to the E...

Biases Attack Pro-Life and Pro-Family Organizations

  The debate on abortion was stirred up again after the recent leak of the draft proposal of the US Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. Mainly negative reactions to this news circulated in the media. The debate on abortion has become increasingly subjective where, particularly, the pro-life arguments are marginalized and negatively framed. Last February, we saw this in the European Parliament as well where the FEMM committee (Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality of the European Parliament) held a public hearing on the ‘Countering the anti-gender movement today to secure a gender equal Europe tomorrow’ , a side event of the Future of Europe Conference. As the title of the hearing suggests, this event was a one-sided story on the topic, seeking to invalidate other opinions and attacking several Christian organizations on their pro-life advocacy and promotion of Christian values. The hearing displayed the immaturity of the debate on abortion and gender issues. There is n...