Skip to main content

Large Number of reported Cases on Intolerance and Legal Restrictions effecting Christians in Europe

The Observatory on Intolerance and Discrimination against Christians releases 41 examples of national laws with adverse effects on Christians in more than 15 European Countries. Additionally, 169 cases of intolerance against Christians in the EU – area in 2012 are portrayed.
The report was presented on May 21 at an OSCE High Level Conference on Tolerance and Non-discrimination held in Tirana, Albania, in a keynote speech delivered by the Observatory’s director Dr. Gudrun Kugler.

The report  has 69 pages and contains two parts: First, legal restrictions effecting Christians in Europe and secondly, the most striking cases of intolerance and discrimination throughout Europe in the year 2012.
The basis of the research for the first part was an expert survey the Observatory conducted in over 30 countries in 2012.
Problems were highlighted especially in these areas: 
  • Limiting Conscientious Objection (especially in: Belgium, France, the Czech Republic, Austria, and Ireland);
  • Curbing Free Speech by Hate Speech Legislation (France, Sweden, and the United Kingdom);
  • Violations of Freedom of Assembly and Association (Germany, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain),
  • Discriminatory Equality Policies (EU, United Kingdom, Denmark, Ireland, Netherlands, and Spain) and
  • Limiting Parental Rights (Belgium, France, Germany, Slovakia, Spain, and Sweden).
UK based former politician Ann Widdecomb recently said: „If the small beginnings are not resisted then they grow into something bigger.“ 
Dr. Gudrun Kugler: „I am glad that finally, the problem of intolerance against Christians in Europe comes to light: The Council of Europe, the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the European Institutions have begun to work on it."
Kugler continues: „Sometimes I get asked, how can a majority be discriminated against? Well, it is not the nominal Christian who is fully aligned to society’s mainstream, who suffers discrimination. It is those who strive to live according to the high ethical demands of Christianity, who experience a clash. Those are not the majority. And even if they were: History has shown that a leading minority can discriminate against a peaceful majority, as we saw in the striking example of apartheid.“
The Observatory recommends to policy makers to look for „reasonable accommodation“ when it comes to the clash between people of faith and a mainstream which seems to be at unease with religion. It calls upon countries to disaggregate data also with a view to hate crimes against Christianity.
Press Kit (Fotos; Logo; CV)



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Christmas Greeting

1 comment
Read more

Corruption Scandal on the Sale of Schengen Visas in Malta discussed in the European Parliament

Ivan Grech Mintoff (leader of the ECPM-Member Party Alleanza Bidla) presented in the Maltese court  a transcript of the testimonies of several Libyans who claimed that in 2015, they bought an unknown number of humanitarian medical visas from an official in the Office of the of the Maltese Prime Minister. These medical visas are not supposed to be sold. Following an agreement between Malta and Libya, they are issued for free. The documents submitted in the court also claim that Schengen visas were illicitly sold at the Maltese Consulate in Tripoli over a period of 14 months (in 2013 and 2014). In this period, 88000 Schengen Visas (300 visas per day including Saturdays and Sundays) have been sold. This illegal scheme could have earned the perpetrators millions of euros.  Although the Consulate in Tripoli has closed, it is unclear if this practice has stopped or is still continuing via other countries or Malta up to today. On the 27th of June, ECPM invited Mr Mintoff to the E...
10 comments
Read more

Biases Attack Pro-Life and Pro-Family Organizations

  The debate on abortion was stirred up again after the recent leak of the draft proposal of the US Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. Mainly negative reactions to this news circulated in the media. The debate on abortion has become increasingly subjective where, particularly, the pro-life arguments are marginalized and negatively framed. Last February, we saw this in the European Parliament as well where the FEMM committee (Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality of the European Parliament) held a public hearing on the ‘Countering the anti-gender movement today to secure a gender equal Europe tomorrow’ , a side event of the Future of Europe Conference. As the title of the hearing suggests, this event was a one-sided story on the topic, seeking to invalidate other opinions and attacking several Christian organizations on their pro-life advocacy and promotion of Christian values. The hearing displayed the immaturity of the debate on abortion and gender issues. There is n...
Post a Comment
Read more