Skip to main content

European Commission finds it difficult to explain its funding for homosexual lobby groups

It was of course never to be expected that the European Commission, as a reply to critical questions from the European Parliament with regard to the generous funding it is handing out to ILGA-Europe (a homosexual lobby group), would openly acknowledge to have committed a misuse of budgetary funds. But if replies to parliamentary questions are evasive and not to the point, this can be viewed as a clear indication that the Commission finds it very difficult to explain to the public what it is doing.

Click here for an interesting article with the official asked questions of MEP Godfrey Bloom to the European Commission, the answers of different European Commissioners. Unfortunately it shows a lack of transparency in spending money, a strange relations with the Civil Society and a low level of democracy. This all in times of economic crisis where lots of money seemed to be wasted....... 

(Source: turtlebay and beyond)
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousMarch 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM

    Hello ,

    There is a big problem of discrimination in Republic of Moldova,

    link http://stop-terorism.blogspot.com/2012/03/skip-to-main-content-site-ul-vechi.html

    John Onoje , was discriminated by comunist party in Chisinau,with rassist declaration of Vladimir Voronin,the leader of communists.

    Also he was tortured in street by communists agents of Voronin.

    Is it ok to complain to CEDO,or can you help John Onoje to obtain Political asylum in Germany?

    John Onoje asked people,and protested in street for Moldova to join NATO and EU,and he protested against russian ocupation teritory of Transnistria, OSCE also is against ocupation.

    Please write me if you can help John Onoje in one way,at puscasuvlad@ymail.com

    or write for political asylum in EU,in Germany.He is originar from Sierra Leone, and his parents were killed there in civil war for diamonds.

    Best regards,

    Puscasu Vlad Irimie

    Prolife Romania
    Ion Ratiu Foundation activist
    Human Rights Activists Romania
    Cluj Napoca

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Christmas Greeting

1 comment
Read more

Corruption Scandal on the Sale of Schengen Visas in Malta discussed in the European Parliament

Ivan Grech Mintoff (leader of the ECPM-Member Party Alleanza Bidla) presented in the Maltese court  a transcript of the testimonies of several Libyans who claimed that in 2015, they bought an unknown number of humanitarian medical visas from an official in the Office of the of the Maltese Prime Minister. These medical visas are not supposed to be sold. Following an agreement between Malta and Libya, they are issued for free. The documents submitted in the court also claim that Schengen visas were illicitly sold at the Maltese Consulate in Tripoli over a period of 14 months (in 2013 and 2014). In this period, 88000 Schengen Visas (300 visas per day including Saturdays and Sundays) have been sold. This illegal scheme could have earned the perpetrators millions of euros.  Although the Consulate in Tripoli has closed, it is unclear if this practice has stopped or is still continuing via other countries or Malta up to today. On the 27th of June, ECPM invited Mr Mintoff to the E...
10 comments
Read more

Biases Attack Pro-Life and Pro-Family Organizations

  The debate on abortion was stirred up again after the recent leak of the draft proposal of the US Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade. Mainly negative reactions to this news circulated in the media. The debate on abortion has become increasingly subjective where, particularly, the pro-life arguments are marginalized and negatively framed. Last February, we saw this in the European Parliament as well where the FEMM committee (Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality of the European Parliament) held a public hearing on the ‘Countering the anti-gender movement today to secure a gender equal Europe tomorrow’ , a side event of the Future of Europe Conference. As the title of the hearing suggests, this event was a one-sided story on the topic, seeking to invalidate other opinions and attacking several Christian organizations on their pro-life advocacy and promotion of Christian values. The hearing displayed the immaturity of the debate on abortion and gender issues. There is n...
Post a Comment
Read more